Skip to content

How it works

HTMA Measure follows a decision-first sequence.

The agent identifies:

  • the decision;
  • the quantity of interest;
  • the unit;
  • the time horizon;
  • the decision threshold; and
  • the cost of being wrong.

If a required identifier, period, jurisdiction, or private fact is missing, the workflow stops and names the blocker.

The same noun can refer to different quantities. “Cost” might mean:

  • a vendor’s public market price;
  • a budget allowance;
  • the amount likely paid;
  • an official fee;
  • a statutory rate; or
  • an ambiguous target that needs clarification.

The mode determines which evidence and adjustments are legitimate.

The agent starts with available local context, then uses direct sources, reference classes, and comparable cases. Each source is judged against the target for quality and freshness.

Confirmed facts stay separate from assumptions and inference.

The quantity is broken into smaller components with low, central, and high values. Weak bounds are widened rather than hidden behind precision.

Monte Carlo simulation is optional and only follows credible, calibrated inputs.

The final interval is compared with the decision threshold. The memo explains whether the range sits above, below, or across that threshold and what action follows.

The value-of-information section ranks remaining uncertainties by their ability to change the decision. It names the next useful measurement and the point at which further research stops mattering.

The result is a readable memo plus an HTMA_RESULT JSON appendix for scoring, automation, or later calibration review.