Test Sales Research

This is an experimental shared workflow. Installation checks can establish that an agent receives the files; they cannot establish sales effectiveness.

Try it in a fresh project

1. Create an empty project directory and install only sales-research using the installation guide.
2. Start a fresh agent conversation. Choose one example and replace its fields with redacted facts you know.
3. Confirm that the response fits the sales context, preserves unknowns, and leads toward a decision you can act on.
4. Follow its citations. Check whether the particular page supports the claim.
5. Try a different context, such as employment or SaaS support. It should not blindly apply consulting paid-discovery rules.
6. Try without browsing. It should disclose missing verification and avoid inventing attributed claims.

Send useful feedback

Use this template in a GitHub issue after removing private information:

Agent and model:
Install command and project/global scope:
Date and repository revision, if known:
Browsing available:
Redacted prompt:
What I expected:
What happened:
Redacted output or relevant excerpt:
Which citation or recommendation I checked:

Avoid sharing customer identities, private transcripts, account details, or live negotiation terms. A compact redacted example is enough to report a problem.

Maintainer checks

The skill includes four authored synthetic scenarios and a manual evaluation procedure. Their expectations are criteria, not recorded passes.

Portable-package behavioral runs and sales outcome measurements have not been completed. The release preparation checks below cover packaging only. A successful local install is separate from a verified GitHub install and a deployed documentation website.

Local packaging checks, 2026-09-18

Check	Observed result
Skill frontmatter validator	Passed
Codex plugin validator	Passed
Claude plugin and marketplace validators	Passed
Skills CLI 1.5.24, local source	Discovered four skills and installed only Sales Research into an empty project for Codex and Claude Code
Installed file comparison	Recursive comparison matched the canonical skill directory
Secret scan	Gitleaks found no leaks in the skill package
Documentation build	Passed; emitted all four Sales Research pages and the llms exports
Docs-spec gate	Passed all 11 checks with no warnings
Existing install-command runner tests	Passed all three tests

These checks used the local checkout. At this September 18 checkpoint, remote GitHub installation, live website publication, and independent behavioral evaluations had not been verified.